4 Substantial Problems Guys Produce in Its dating profiles for men
Very few in my city.
Instead with the much acclaimed Tinder from you, as soon as I registered I received several matches (with some I wrote to myself and with a couple I saw myself), but after a week … the desert of the Tartars … before each heart I clicked was 70 out of 100 match… after 0 out of 100… it seems like a joke. In the sense that they entice you and then if you want to continue having matches you have to shell out money …
Hi Luca, thanks for your feedback. I’ve heard of Once, but I’ve never tried it … in my city, I think it would be practically useless.
Anyway congratulations, if you really got the likes of 7 out of 10 girls, you are one of the most beautiful guys to have appeared on Tinder.
At the beginning (just registered) it is normal to have a small popularity boost, but then it is not that without shelling out money the app will stop you having matches.
A slight drop is normal, but from 70% to 0% it makes me think more of your mistake in processing this statistic.
Hello. Look, just in these days three matches have arrived, but I assure you that as soon as I signed up it rained. I went to check. I had 9 matches in 4 days. And I don’t give preference to all of them… on the contrary… I am quite selective. Of those 9, 2 did not answer me, 3 disappeared after a couple of messages (so much so that I thought about fake profiles) and with the other 4 I had a long chat, so much so that with 2 I also saw myself.
And as for being the most beautiful of those who appeared on Tinder, I would say that I don’t think so. I am absolutely normal. I wrote a witty sentence in my profile and tried to put photos that enhance me.
As I wrote, the situation has recovered a little in these days. There was, however, a dead period. Rare proposals and 0 matches.
Okay, I don’t know how many girls you like, but these numbers are already very plausible.
In the sense, in the previous message you were talking about 70 matches out of 100 swipes, which makes one think of mind-boggling numbers, considering that 100 swipes do them in 10 minutes.
9 matches in 4 days is okay, as is the fact that for a few days you have not received anything – it happens.
Statistically speaking, having 2 matches a day and then a few 0s in a row is not a particularly significant anomaly, because the sample is small. If I had done 50 \ day and then 5 \ day for a week it would have been different, so to speak.
However, in addition to the small initial boost for new users (which I had already mentioned), also consider that Tinder shows you the most active and compatible female profiles with the highest chance of success first, then all the others.
I do not think this is an “incorrect” practice to entice you to do the Premium: whether you buy a subscription or not, after a more active start the numbers will inevitably tend to decrease, because the most active profiles to scroll will decrease.
Honestly, I prefer an app that immediately lets me scroll through the most promising profiles and then the less active ones: if there is a profile with which I will probably have a match, I would like to see it as soon as possible, no need to wait for a better match balance in the course of the month. Indeed, just the balancing sticazzi, give me everything immediately! 😀
A girl who connects once a week, however, I would like to see her only when I do not have better alternatives, because it is a (possible) match that will probably only waste my time.
Maybe I expressed myself badly. That 70 out of 100 wasn’t really 70 matches out of 100 swipes.