4 Big Blunders Fellas Help make inside Their own dating profiles for men
For example, a Chinese girl receives likes from A and B but not from C, D and E. The same happens with 10 other Chinese girls.
A and B are used to like the same girls, in short, they have similar tastes, and even if Tinder doesn’t know that these girls are Chinese, it knows that they fall within the common tastes of A and B.
Then you sign up, and after 50 swipes Tinder realizes that you have tastes similar to A and B, but not to C, D and E.
Consequently, for the future it will show you the girls that A and B have liked, that is… Chinese girls.
This is undoubtedly one of your best articles, also because here you have fully hit the point.
I’d almost like to say: the only thing that really matters, but that wouldn’t be exactly right.
But being based on the same scheme, they ensure that only the aesthetic aspect is given priority.
Hence, without a proper exterior appearance, there is no result on any of these sites.
Clearly beauty is subjective: anyone can consider a person to be more or less beautiful / attractive, depending on his personal aesthetic standards or personal preferences.
Therefore, a minimum standard cannot be precisely defined with certainty, because each individual elicits different reactions from possible candidates.
However, as the number of individuals who do not consider a particular subject attractive, each for their own reasons, it can be said that the global level of external dislike increases.
It means that individuals involuntarily contribute to creating average standards of satisfaction, according to which some subjects exceed this average threshold, and others instead do not reach it at all.
When this minimum level is not reached, it happens to be in the condition of always being discarded.
This doesn’t necessarily mean that no one likes you: it means that none of the ones we like.
Well, it changes little actually, because it is likely that the dislike could also come from those we ourselves dislike or did not appreciate.
You will then wonder if whoever is in this situation is an incredible toilet, if it is unwatchable or if it inspires terror / disgust: it is not said.
At least I think I’m not that negative. I am not disgusted as for example a character like Rosario Muniz can do in his videos.
Yet, it will also be the fault of the level of competition, it will be the fault of my decidedly anonymous / poor external level, it will be for other factors, I end up being in the same category as those who arouse horror / disgust, or who is never appreciated.
It follows that in my view there is a disproportion in these sites, where apparently normal people are no longer seen as sufficient, in short, they are no longer enough.
The paradox is that they should / could help anyone, especially those who feel ashamed or embarrassed in real life, or perhaps those who lack the chance to meet girls, etc …
Yet it ends up helping only one category of users: those who have the privilege of having an overall appearance appreciated by the majority of the public.
For everyone else, that tool that could have been a help or even the only way to get to know people turns out to be just a useless waste of time.
Then it is up to everyone’s intelligence to determine if it must also be an economic loss, and as you may have guessed from my comments, I am witty enough not to fall into the trap of unnecessarily enriching the managers of these sites.
In my opinion the reviews and opinions don’t raise the main warning enough: DO NOT use these sites if you are not cool enough.